Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Understanding Cinema: Comparative Narrative Analysis of Citizen Kane and Rashomon.

If cinema were an infinite road, stretching on to eternity, Rashomon and Citizen Kane would be significant milestones one would discover along the way. Both had redefined the narrative style of story-telling with path-breaking technique, riveting storylines and memorable performances.
Released in a gap of nine years, both films were recipients of Academy Awards (Citizen Kane for Best Writing, Original Screenplay; Rashomon for Best Film in Foreign Category).
Citizen Kane (1941) follows the dramatic rise and fall of media moghul, Charles Foster Kane, from a humble beginning in Colorado, to one of idealistic (initially) service at The Inquirer newspaper, to an unsuccessful foray into politics. Kane dies alone in the end, uncared for and isolated from the world. His self-created Utopia – Xanadu remains an emblem of his life – towering, ostentatious and incomplete.
Rashomon (1950) traces the aftermath of a rape and murder from the perspective of the perpetrator and the victims.  A young wife is raped by the bandit Tajômaru in the presence of her samurai husband, who is tied to a tree. The husband is later murdered. The gravity of the crime(s) may not change, but the versions of all involved certainly do.
Having briefly understood the storyline of both the films, we shall now endeavour to examine the most salient features that propelled these celluloid tales to cult status.





THE ANALYSIS

§  The framing and core narrative: In simple terms, the framing narrative comprises of those sequences which take place outside the main story, whereas the core narrative consists of scenes which are the main plot in itself.

Ø Citizen Kane: Citizen Kane’s framing narrative features the long drawn search by a generally anonymous journalist named Thompson. He interviews the key characters who were closely associated with Kane. It is their reminisces that take the audience to the core narrative featuring Charles Foster Kane.

The overall narrative of Citizen Kane is the journey of a reporter as he tries to unravel the mystery behind Kane’s last word – “Rosebud.” It depicts the different relationship Kane had with each character, while also dealing with their perception of him.

Ø Rashomon: The track of the Woodcutter, Listener and Priest discussing the horrific incident forms the framing narrative of the story. The courtyard scenes where the characters give their testimony and the varying nature of the incident itself (a flashback within a flashback) forms the core narrative of the plot.

Rashomon has an aura of mystery like Citizen Kane, but its core narrative deals with finding the truth behind a crime, than a particular person.

§  Editing:

Ø Citizen Kane: It makes extensive use of dissolves, long-shots, fading, and super-imposition for appropriate dramatic effect. Some examples of memorable editing from the film are as follows:

o   The opening sequence: The silhouetted quietude of the opening montage, right from the upward pan to the “No Trespassing” sign to the dissolves leading to the foreboding interiors of his room contrasts with the abrupt beginning and end of the New on the March newsreel. The viewer is then abruptly jerked into a projection room, dimly lit by the outlines of men. This opening sets the mood of the film, invariably preparing the audience for the somber atmosphere that was to follow.

o   The flashbacks: Every recollection of the character leads to a dissolve into their memory of that time. Especially the scene where the page of Thatcher’s memoir dissolves from an unclear haze to a snowy wilderness, which perfectly captures the barren isolation of his childhood.

o   The breakfast scene: Leland’s description of Kane’s marriage leads to a reference cut (in a dissolve) to Kane and Emily at the breakfast table. The scene shows their marital discord through a series of innovative cuts. It begins with the newly married couple in wedded bliss. The camera spins in a fast flick pan which results in a change of costume, background score, implying a passage of time. The music now gets more discordant as the scene progresses, ending only with Emily reading The Chronicle at the farthest end of the table.

o   The super-imposition of headlines and stage performances: One of the most memorable visuals in the film is the super-imposition of laudatory newspaper headlines (The Inquirer’s), Susan’s performances and the flickering light bulb.

o   The climax: The climax denotes the end of the story after it comes in a full circle. The camera pans out of the mansion, and down the fence to the formidable “No Trespassing” sign. It dissolves to the smoke coming out of the chimney, a profound metaphor to what eventually became of his life.

Ø Rashomon:

o   Opening sequence: The film opens with The Woodcutter and Priest taking shelter from the rain at the Rashomon Gate. Before the entry of The Listener, there is a deathly silence in the scene. There is very little camera movement in the scene, with the emphasis mostly on the downpour and the grim expressions of both the protagonists.

o   The Woodcutter’s walk: What could have otherwise been a long drawn sequence is edited to sustain the interest of the audience. Various tracking shots of the sun gleaming through the trees, of The Woodcutter (with frequent close-ups of the back of his head; his axe) are interspersed with long shots of him walking through the forest. This clearly establishes the setting. The brevity of each shot illustrates a sense of pace and ominousness.

o   The fight sequence: There is a great sense of pace conveyed through the fight sequence because of the brief cutting in the bandit’s version. Because the men are reluctant to fight in The Woodcutter’s version, the cutting is invariably slower, and the camera movements more static.

o   Change of sequence: Kurosawa makes use of wipes to switch between a character’s narration of the incident in the courtyard to the actual event itself. The wipe was also used to switch between two testimonies like between The Woodcutter and The Priest.

o   The ending sequence: Kurosawa uses the dissolve towards the end, when The Listener leaves the shelter of the Rashomon Gate. The camera dissolves from a long shot to a mid-shot to a close shot of the shocked Priest and Woodcutter. The dissolve beautifully emphasizes the silence of the moment and the collective horror.

§  Composition:

Ø Citizen Kane:

o   Deep focus: Citizen Kane is known to be one of the earliest films to use “deep focus” framing. In such framing, the characters in the foreground and background are both clear and in focus, unlike conventional shots where either one of the characters in blurred or out of focus.

o   Lighting: The opening sequence is the best example of lighting in Citizen Kane. From the darkness of Kane’s bedside to the stark News on the March newsreel to the dim projection room, to Thatcher’s library, to the opera house (and so on), each change in the same location provides a dramatic change of visual.

o   Camera placement: Citizen Kane makes use of innovative camera angles to emphasise a particular relationship between the characters. This is most prominent in the upward camera perspective from Kane’s POV when he looks up at Mr. Thatcher as a child, and in Susan’s POV when she looks at Kane.

It is also placed in such a way that the character in the foreground has a dominating presence over the character in the background. Both camera angles denote a sense of inferiority from the perspective of the character looking up. The camera is also kept at a slant in certain scenes, hence breaking away from the conventional shot taking.

Ø Rashomon:

o   Lighting: The film uses natural light which filters through the foliage. It adds that extra dimension in the drama because of the play in light and shadows, leading to a more haunting effect in the grove. The lighting is stark in the courtyard, as if a metaphor for the austere atmosphere of the court. The cloudy gloom of the Rashomon Gate is also captured beautifully in the opening titles.

o   Camera placement: Kurosawa uses a lot of over-the-shoulder shots, more notably in the grove sequences. There are also shots taken of each character with a deliberate repetition to emphasise the triangular relationship between them. There are also uses of track and pan shots in this sequence (especially when the bandit menacingly circles the samurai).

In the courtyard scene, the camera is placed at an eye level before the parties involved to represent the perspective of the judge, and also of the audience.

§  Dialogue and sound:

Ø Citizen Kane: The dialogue remains with the viewer long after the film is over. There are many lines inside the film which are ironic (“You know, Mr. Bernstein, if I hadn't been very rich, I might have been a really great man”), tragic (“Old age. It's the only disease, Mr. Thompson, that you don't look forward to being cured of.”) and quotable (“To love on my terms. Those are the only terms anybody knows ...  his own.”).

It is the most integral part of Citizen Kane, aiding greatly in the pace and establishing of the characters. This is most notably conveyed through the News on the March opening, Kane’s takeover of the staff of The Chronicle among other key flashback sequences.

The background score for the film was composed by Bernard Herrmann, earning itself an Oscar nomination for Best Music. Along with dialogue, the background score effectively dramatised the proceedings in the film, adapting to suit the changing tone of the story.

Ø Rashomon: Akira Kurosawa’s fascination for the era of silent films is evident by the absence of dialogue in Rashomon. The emphasis is more on close-ups, the ambience of express the gravity of the situation.

However, the use of “Bolero” (Maurice Ravel) in the soundtrack of Fumio Hayasaka cannot be ignored.

§  Symbolism:

Ø Citizen Kane:

o   Xanadu: The forlorn, isolated manor is a symbol of the man himself. It represents the hollowness, the lack of meaning behind frivolous décor and the myth of the American dream. The expansiveness of the manor effectively implies the physical distance between Kane and Susan.

o   “Rosebud” and the snow globe: The sled “Rosebud” and the snow globe stand for the innocence of a childhood lost. When the globe shatters on Kane’s demise and the sled is destroyed in the fire, it signifies an end to that which linked him to his childhood.

o   Statues: The statues in Kane’s office (and later Xanadu) show his need to control the people around him. The more his isolation increases, the greater number of statues he collects. Kane possesses a strange desire to impulsively purchase statues (most unopened), as they, unlike human beings fill the echoing spaces in Xanadu, without clamouring for his attention.

Ø Rashomon:

o   The Rashomon Gate: The Rashomon Gate stands as a symbol of culture and civilization which has been ravaged by the mists of time and the portentous rain. When The Listener desecrates the remains of the gate to create a fire, it shows that even a symbol of culture can be defiled during times of strife.

o   The rain: The rain is a symbol of darkness and gloom. It is aptly depicts the disturbed era the main protagonists are living through.

o   The medium: The medium who conveys the testimony of the dead samurai to the court, adds a metaphysical dimension to the story.

o   The courtyard: Its stark and white surroundings stand for truth as the court wants it – in a kind of cold bluntness.

§  Theme:

Ø Citizen Kane: It deals with the theme of avariciousness, wealth, the relentless pursuit of power and love. Above all, it denounces the myth of the great American dream – the futile search for material happiness. For affluence cannot buy you love.

Ø Rashomon: Rashomon deals not just with the relativity of truth but also the self-image a person creates of oneself. Every character narrates a version which holds him/her in higher stead than the rest of the characters. It raises a disturbing question about the ultimate reality – does it really exist?

CONCLUSION

 This project covers the most salient narrative techniques of both films. However, the remarkable contribution of Rashomon and Citizen Kane to the world of cinema renders the analysis in this project to be woefully inadequate. Nevertheless, the project has initiated a broader perspective on both films, and a greater receptivity regarding the various interpretations offered to those who seek it. Despite being unique for their time, admired and vilified in equal measure (Citizen Kane more specifically), the films lived on to create history and remain a reference point for filmmakers and students of media alike, where aesthetic story-telling is concerned.








BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.     Forward @ 50: My two page Rashomon paper -http://forwardatfifty.blogspot.com/2011/01/my-two-page-rashomon-paper.html

2.     Spark Notes: Citizen Kane - http://www.sparknotes.com/film/citizenkane/themes.html


3.     A Short History of the Movies: Gerald Mast


5.     Movie Rapture: http://www.movierapture.com/rashomon.htm

Lux: product history and trajectory.


The FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) market is highly competitive, one that is rife with the advent of newer brands being introduced. In a capitalist set-up, there begins a system of hard sell and introduction of more innovative products to boost sales and garner a larger consumer base. Advertising is a major player in the arena of marketing. For this, it becomes essential to understand the purpose behind the launch of a product, its various utilities and the trajectory it has mapped in the market.
The soap selected for the study is the globally acclaimed Lux, a product owned by Unilever. In India, Lux is owned by Hindustan Unilever, an offshoot of its Anglo-Dutch counterpart and one of India’s largest FMCG companies. In this project, Lux shall be examined only from the perspective of the Indian market.
A luxurious brand, touted as the ‘beauty soap of the film stars,’ Lux has been a consistent ubiquitous part of the Indian household and one of India’s most trusted personal care products. With generation after generation of women sustaining a product in the market, consistent with its former glory, a statistic mentioning that three in every five Indian consumers use Lux may not seem entirely far-fetched.




PRODUCT LAUNCH AND HISTORY

Initially known as “Sunlight Flakes” laundry soap, Lux was established as a domestic brand in the United Kingdom in 1899. It was produced by a British company named Lever Brothers. The company has been founded by two brothers, James and William Hesketh Lever in 1885.
The brothers manufactured the “Sunlight Soap,” the flaked version of which came to be known as Lux.
Lux was rechristened its present name in 1900 and launched in the United States where its sales picked up.
Lux was launched in India, in 1929. The very first Lux advertisement featured actor Leela Chitnis. Its popular slogan was ‘the beauty soap of film stars.’
In order to remain in tandem with the changing fashion trends, Lux changed its colour and packaging from the 1930s to the 1970s. The five principal colours used for Lux in 1958 were pink, white, blue, green and yellow.
It was only in the 1990s that Lux launched its own range of luxury soaps, shower gels, liquid soaps and moisturising bars. At present, Lux is sold in a 100 countries with a turnover of 1.0 billion euros alone in 2005.
REASON FOR LAUNCH
Lux was launched earlier as laundry soap. Gradually, over the years, it has gained immense popularity and recognition as a luxury soap. Its identity became synonymous with the glamorous lifestyle of the movie stars. Lux has pioneered as being one of the first products to be advertised using women as brand ambassadors.
Earlier a product known for its domestic utility, Lux has moved on to skincare and beauty products as part of its present brand image.

THE PARENT COMPANY

Lux was initially manufactured as “Sunlight Flakes” by Lever Brothers. The company gained foothold in the market only after 1916, when it was launched in the United States. Unilever was founded on the first of January in 1930, an amalgamation of Lever Brothers and the Dutch margarine producer Margarine Unie. The founders were Antonius Johannes Jurgens, Samuel van den Bergh and William Hulme Lever, 2nd Viscount Leverhulme.
Hindustan Unilever Limited was known as Hindustan Vanaspati Manufacturing Company Limited when it was first established in 1931, as a subsidiary of Unilever, in India. Further two companies were launched, namely the Lever Brothers India Limited in 1933 and the United Traders Limited (1935). In 1956, all three companies were merged to form Hindustan Unilever Limited.
At present, the company has a 54.3% market share; headed by Harish Manwani (Chairman) and Nitin Paranjpe (C.E.O. and M.D.).

PRODUCT TRAJECTORY
·         Initial stage (1929 – 1950s): When Lux was first launched in 1929; it was introduced only in major Indian cities. It was kept at a comparatively higher price range than its product competitor Lifebuoy for recovering their initial cost of production. The initial Lux advertisements were aimed at ‘the early adopters’ i.e., the consumers who were most willing to buy that product.

·         Growth stage (1950s – 1990s): The pricing was reduced for the purpose of market penetration. There was an increase in the advertising budget for attracting newer consumers. Lux continued its trend of using renowned actors from the mainstream film industry through the decades. Old time magazines like Eve’s Weekly, Star and Style, Femina etc invariably featured the leading heroines of the times as models for Lux. Some of the prominent heroines featured have been Sharmila Tagore, Hema Malini, Zeenat Aman, Juhi Chawla, Madhuri Dixit and Sridevi.

In the 1990s, Lux launched its own range of luxury soaps, shower gels, liquid soaps and moisturising bars.

·         Maturity (1990s – present): As the product gained greater foothold in the market, the price was increased in order to maximise the profit.

The main marketing objective was also to maximise the market share and introduce modifications in the product. This included a new range of products entering the market like Lux Almond, Lux Orchid, Lux Saffron and Lux Sandalwood to name a few.

The brand ambassadors in this stage have been Aishwarya Rai, Kareena Kapoor, Shah Rukh Khan, Katrina Kaif, Priyanka Chopra and Asin.
As of the year 2011, Lux has a recorded profit of 533 crores.

ADVERTISING AND MARKETING STRATEGY

Despite its product modifications which shall be later mentioned, Lux has always marketed itself as a product used by the stars. A common refrain associated with such a promotional strategy says ‘if it is good enough for the stars, it is good enough for me.’ Despite this, Lux was never an entirely elitist product, though it has not embedded itself within the rural consumer segment.
Because Marketing is all encompassing, it shall be examined first, followed by Advertising.
Marketing covers the four main aspects, when it comes to any product that needs to be sold in a market, namely the: product mix, price mix, place mix and promotion mix. The marketing mix of Lux shall be examined from the perspective of the four P’s in marketing.
·         Product mix: The product mix refers to any and every feature related to the tangible commodity to be sold. This part of marketing takes into consideration the ingredients that form a part of the product, the innovations/modifications done in the product, its external appearance, packaging, aroma, utility, colour, logo and the overall visual appeal/easy recall value it serves for its consumers.

Lux has also taken the initiative to introduce product variants like:

o   Lux almond.
o   Lux orchid.
o   Lux fruit.
o   Lux saffron.
o   Lux oil and honey glow.
o   Lux sandalwood.
o   Lux rose.
o   Lux international.
o   Lux chocolate.
o   Lux aromatic extracts.
o   Lux crystal shine.
o   Lux purple lotus and cream.
o   Lux peach and cream.
o   Lux strawberry and cream.

·         Price mix: A sound pricing strategy induces a consumer to purchase a certain product. It proves to be a worthy incentive. In a country of wide economic disparities like India, the price of the product takes precedence over the quality, for the less affluent.

When Lux was launched in 1929, the pricing was kept high so that the product could make up for its manufacturing cost. The prices were later reduced in order to penetrate a greater market segment. As of now, the product pricing is competitive i.e. on par with those of the competitors.

·         Place mix: The place mix refers to not just the distribution channels of a product, but also the geographic location of its availability which greatly affects its accessibility. Lux was earlier sold only in major cities at the time of its launch. Post 1950s, the distribution network continues to be expanded to include smaller towns.

·         Promotion mix: A hoarding on one of the more prominent locations in Mumbai once said, “Doing business without advertising is like winking at a girl in the dark. You know what you’re doing, but she doesn’t.” And thus, promotion seeks to bridge the gap between ignorance and purchase.

The ‘how’ and ‘why’ behind the promotion goes a long way in brand building.

o   As reiterated in this project, Lux was promoted as a product used by film stars. And thus, every major actor has promoted the product. The list included: Leela Chitnis, Madhubala, Nargis, Meena Kumari, Mala Sinha, Sharmila Tagore, Waheeda Rehman, Saira Banu, Hema Malini, Zeenat Aman, Juhi Chawla, Tabu, Madhuri Dixit, Sridevi, Aishwarya Rai, Kareena Kapoor, Priyanka Chopra, Katrina Kaif, Asin and Kajal Agarwal.

o   Although Lux was always advertised as a product meant for indulging the senses, where bathing was a wonderful ritual in itself, it petered down its approach in the recent years. The actors are still shown seen indulging themselves. But the focus also moves towards the ordinary girl in a bid to reach out to its female consumers.

o   A wonderful example of this promotion was the 2005 ‘Mujhme Star Jagaaye’ campaign featuring Aishwarya Rai and Shilpa Anand. The campaign also promoted a Model Hunt that went underway soon after.

o   In 2001, Lux had announced a 22-carat Gold Star offer, wherein a gold coin was hidden inside a bar of soap. The lucky consumers who find the gold coin also have a chance to win an additional 30 grams of gold.

o   In 2004, Lux launched a ‘Lux star bano, Aish karo’ contest where consumers were supposed to buy a promotional pack of Lux and scratch the special scratch card to earn their reward. Prizes varied from living a day in Aishwarya Rai’s life to beauty kits, Neeta Lulla saris among a host of other gift vouchers and well… more Lux soaps to be won.

o   On its completion of 75 years in 2005, Lux roped in Shah Rukh Khan as its first ever male ambassador. The advertisement featured the actor in a bathtub, flanked by his leading ladies – Juhi Chawla, Kareena Kapoor, Sridevi and Hema Malini. It was known as the ‘Har Star Lucky Star’ offer, where every wrapper guaranteed a gift, waiting to be unwrapped.

o   In 2009, Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan featured in the new ‘Sone Se Bhi Sona Lage’ campaign. The campaign also conducted a Lux Super Star Offer where the lucky winners get to meet Aishwarya-Abhishek in London. The campaign jingle became so immensely popular that its varied renditions were used in the advertisements that featured Katrina Kaif since 2009.

o   Asin Thottumkal and Kajal Agarwal are the newest brand ambassadors of Lux, modelling together for the “Kya Khoob Ho Tum” advertisement that has been recently released.

o   Lux also relies on market research for making innovative changes by going for door-to-door sampling of a product, once a year, in urban and rural areas. The brand image is firmly and favourably embedded in the psyche of the consumers. The product is also not particularly expensive, which is said to be a ‘winning combination.’

·         Weaknesses: The weaknesses stated for Lux as a brand are as follows:

o   The product lacks unisex appeal.
o   It has been unable to effectively tap the rural market.
o   Lux faces competition from brands like Lifebuoy, Pears, Vivel, Fiama Di Wills, Santoor among others.
·         Some commonly noted recommendations for Lux:

o   Innovations in terms of Ayurvedic variants are recommended.
o   A special offshoot of Lux meant for children, since it has essentially been targeted at a 16-35 year age group.
o   The consumer base in the rural area needs to be expanded upon.
o   The product should appeal to men, without promoting it solely as a product for women.
o   The product can be altered to appeal to the ageing segment of women who form a large segment of consumer base in the present product market and account for many billions of currency for anti-ageing products.

CONCLUSION

The assignment is an educative exploration of one of the most iconic products that has entered the Indian market. The history of the Lux soap has been synonymous with women and beauty down the decades. The brand, ‘Lux’ has been identifiable with women of every generation since the times the product were launched through the media, evolving from the print to audio and visual through the decades. From the earlier sepia-toned photographs of beautiful heroines captured in the pages of women’s magazines and Reader’s Digests to popular advertising in electronic and visual mediums, the brand Lux has pervaded the lives and times of every person. It has successfully transcended the barriers of class and elitism and has occupied center-stage as a product appealing to women of all ages and classes.
Given the present market share of the product as examined in the preceding text, Lux has more than a promising void to fulfill in the coming times. Its continuity and popularity will sustain its consumer base in all coming times. Lux stands out as the soul product by way of a soap that has seen the dawn of two centuries, promising to run its length of continuity for many more to come.





BIBLIOGRAPHY

Cultural Studies: In the realm of Fire.

Homosexuality has been condemned as a social aberration for centuries. Even Lord Macaulay’s Indian Penal Code renders it an unnatural act, liable to punishment. Despite finding references to it in religious scriptures, if not in social sanction, homosexuality has only now begun to find acceptance within the country. The gay pride parades and prime time debates in the media mark the beginning of what is going to be a long drawn battle for acceptance. It will take generations for mindsets to change, for the social stigma to subside. In Delhi HC’s stay on prosecution of homosexuality has led to an appeal still pending in the Supreme Court. The issue lies in a limbo of uncertainty.

Deepa Mehta’s Fire was a powerful statement and a path-breaking challenge to the prevalent social norms on the subject. The message was simple – man had the right to life and desire. The suppression of yearning only multiplied it tenfold. Radha (Shabana Azmi) and Sita (Nandita Das) – the main protagonists – find comfort and solace in their unusual companionship after being neglected by their respective husbands.

The film attracted its fair share of controversy for its bold theme and bolder enactment. Shabana Azmi had even admitted to being hesitant while signing for the film, so forbidden was the subject. Through this project, we shall study the cultural implications of homosexuality projected through the film in a systematic manner.

GENERAL PERCEPTION OF HOMOSEXUALITY

A recent survey in a newspaper had revealed a growing acceptance for homosexuality in society. However, there is no way to validate the answers of those interviewed, for it has now become politically correct to support homosexuality. Openly, at least. There still lingers a less idyllic reality behind closed doors and closets of sexuality. Anonymous case studies have exposed a cultural hypocrisy and a blatant refusal on the part of the parents to accept their child’s sexuality.

The acknowledgement of sexual love between a man and a woman in our culture has always been a disconcerting topic of discussion, one that was hurriedly swept under the carpet. Therefore, the instances of homosexual behaviour were considered a “Western import”, a phenomenon that was not a part of “Indian culture.” Needless to say, it has only begun to be noticed as an alternate sexuality.

Gay and lesbian couples have been blackmailed into silence as they fear persecution and for their reputation under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. Yoga guru Baba Ramdev was outspoken in his opinion of homosexuality, brazenly labelling it as a ‘disease’, one that could be cured by yoga. Manvendra Singh Gohil, the gay prince of Rajpipla had openly taken up Ramdev on this claim.[1]

The short-term public memory ensured that the controversy died a natural death. Recently, Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad had stated that homosexuality was not only a disease, “but it is also unnatural.”[2] This comment raised a hornet’s net on this issue.
In this environment of disparagement, few have mustered the courage to live their reality openly.

A majority of them submit to the social pressure and biological necessity of heterosexual marriages. Inevitably, neither partner is able to satisfy the other. However, the stark truth remains hidden. Such couples then exist in a state of unfortunate compromise.

GAY INDIAN CELEBRITIES

There are only a handful of Indian celebrities who are open about their sexuality. Even filmmaker Karan Johar, known for his forthrightness declined to comment over his much speculated sexuality. Others like Manvendra Singh Gohil, designer Rohit Verma, actor Bobby Darling and journalist Ashok Row Kavi had to face immense family disapproval and social embarrassment for coming out of the closet.

Designer Rohit Bal has always been candid about his sexuality and his relationship with upcoming model, Lalit Tehlan. When asked about his stance in an interview he said, “Why shouldn’t I be open?... I have no control over my likes and dislikes. God made me like this. What I do in my bedroom has nothing to do with my abilities as a designer… you can’t be born a cat and act like a dog. It’s better to live… with dignity.”

It is very disheartening for the LGBT community to live in a society which evaluates them on the “good Indian values” they are to uphold than on all that they have to offer. It should be no surprise to any of us to still have fewer celebrities willingly holding a beacon of hope for the common man, unlike the West.
Noted mythologist, Dr. Devdutt Patnaik has stated in one of his columns that the concept of homosexuality was not alien to Indian culture.[3] A sense of conservatism descended during the era of the British rule in India. Macaulay’s draconian law in section 377 of the Indian Penal Code enforced a sense of shame. In abiding within the shackles of colonial supremacy, the cultural prominence of homosexuality was forgotten.

In the grand pagodas of eastern and southern India such as Puri and Tanjore, we find depictions of erotic same-sex liaison. Similar images adorned the prayer halls and cave temples of monastic orders such as Jainism and Buddhism.

Homosexuality finds an instance in Valmiki’s Ramayana where Rakshasa women would kiss and embrace. As also in the Padma Purana which had two queens attempting to conceive by making love to each other after the untimely death of their husband.

There is also the story of Shikandi in Mahabharata, who despite being born a girl had been raised like a boy. Later in the story, Shikandi acquires male organs to make love to his wife in order to prove his manhood.

Therefore, to dismiss homosexuality as an affliction from the Western culture reeks of ignorance about our own culture. It has, after all, been a reality for centuries and shall continue to do so.

FIRE – AN OVERVIEW
·         The Plot:  A newly wedded bride, Sita (Nandita Das) is greatly disillusioned by her husband’s aloofness. She senses the same emptiness in her sister-in-law, Radha (Shabana Azmi), whose husband has taken an oath of celibacy. Their humdrum existence, marked only by their domestic errands and festivals, brings them closer.

It takes a stolen kiss one night for the women to realise their mutual attraction for each other. From that point onward begins a clandestine romance between opposites, tempered with a latent fear of society. It eventually builds and reaches a point where all regard for “societal values” is lost.

Weary of the patriarchal oppression, the women leave the house together to face an uncertain future, but a shared destiny.
·         Relevance:  Although the theme of Fire is homosexuality, there is a strong undercurrent of chauvinism. Director Deepa Mehta has tried to reveal the hypocrisy of the male dominated society. The trespasses committed by the male members of the family are ignored, their gravity negated. But a trait as natural as homosexuality as a means to satisfying a natural urge is met with disdain and eventual ostracism.

The consequences greatly suppressed the individual’s right to choose for centuries. Through this film, Ms. Mehta has ignited and passed on the Fire of defiance at a time when it was most needed.
·         Portrayal of homosexuality and other characters in the film:  The director Deepa Mehta had, without enforcing stereotypes, etched memorable and realistic characters on celluloid. From the outside, Sita and Radha’s joint family (including their spouses, an ailing mother-in-law and a servant) seems a typical middle-class set-up with the men earning and the women having precious little to occupy themselves with.

The two protagonists are regular home-makers, fulfilling everyone’s needs but their own. Beneath the façade of a conservative household lay a reality of discontentment, religious superstition and a sub-text of patriarchy. Sita’s husband, Jatin (Javed Jaffrey) is still in a relationship with his Japanese girlfriend. Radha’s husband, Ashok (Kulbhushan Kharbanda) neglects her for the higher cause of “spirituality.”

The two women work dutifully at the dhaba owned by their husbands; tend to their mother-in-law and the household chores. The men are never expected to help around the house and Jatin’s extra-marital affair is never spoken strongly against. However, when the two women discover and act upon their true sexual impulse, it is met by collective revulsion.

The family, being a victim of its own conditioning, shuns the women. The husbands are never questioned about their lack of contribution since the women are expected to pick up after them.

The family’s horror pertaining to their sexuality seems to stem as much from an archaic idea of sexuality as from the thought of women seeking their own happiness beyond the oppressive social parameters.

Ashok’s reaction to his wife, Radha’s sexuality is peculiar. He seems less offended by the revelation than by the fact that he could not satisfy her. He considers her homosexuality a slight to his own manhood.

Sita’s husband Jatin too, does not take very kindly to her declination of his sexual overtures.
·         Reception:  The film raised eyebrows and a lot of uncomfortable questions about the real prevalence of the “disease.” Offended MPs repeatedly asserted that even if there existed clandestine liaisons between women, the film would only encourage such “perverse behaviour.”

The Shiv Sena protested against the film, by calling it an insult to Hinduism and Indian culture. Cinema halls were vandalised, with the pandemonium ending only on the condition that the female protagonists were given Muslim names. Bal Thackeray claimed that homosexuality did not exist in Hindu families. He also said that ‘Radha’ and ‘Sita’ were names of Hindu goddesses, hence a direct affront to the religion.

The extreme political backlash compelled Ms. Mehta to appeal to the Supreme Court for the smooth running of the film. There was immense media attention given to the parliamentary debates. The morality and the message in the film were questioned and counter-questioned. Ashok Row Kavi in defense of the film said that the protests were the latest form of “gay bashing in homophobic India.”

However, the public reaction was entirely different. The film ran to packed houses for three weeks and received much critical acclaim. Fire is said to be India’s first film on lesbianism. Films made on the same topic followed much later. Fire was the forerunner and precursor to this genre.

The encouraging feedback to the film was to later motivate more filmmakers to make something along the same lines. Fire, as Deepa Mehta had put it, was not a film about homosexuality so much as it was about the choices a person made.

For the protagonists, it was indeed a difficult choice to make between breaking free and preserving the family structure.
CONCLUSION
The research and opinions penned for this project are an attempt to evenly balance the issue of homosexuality. It is an attempt to validate a pro-homosexual stand with a reaffirmation in the changing times. It is only when an individual applies thought to a notion, pre-conceived or otherwise, does a clearer image appear from an academic point of view.

This project begs to examine the following question – what is the future of homosexuality in India? Will there be an eventual acceptance? Will the politicization of the issue come to an end? When will section 377 be repealed from the Indian Penal Code? It has already been upheld by the Delhi High Court and awaits a judgement of finality from the Apex Court.

Though there is greater acceptance of homosexuality than in 1996, (the year Fire was released), it remains to be seen if collective will can be mustered to bring about a change in legislation. In that event, the issue will be tackled on an open platform and addressed with a spirit of acceptance.

Freedom of self-expression does not have to be clamped down because of a dictatorial tyranny in a democracy. More and more NGOs have come out in open support of the LGBT community. They are now more assertive about their rights and vocal about the portrayal of gay stereotypes in movies.

It is time that a suppressed and criminalized gay community rose to demand equality, recognition and respect. It is too late to shun the tide of progress. It is time to have the issue gain importance for a public podium. The time is now.


[2] This had led to an angry response from the readers and members of the LGBT community alike: http://www.mid-day.com/news/2011/jul/050711-Pink-community-Gay-Ghulam-Nabi-Azad-LGBT-homosexuality.htm
[3] Dr. Patnaik’s insightful article on homosexuality and the Indian culture is available here: http://devdutt.com/did-homosexuality-exist-in-ancient-india/

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Mad, mad, mad, mad world.

Mom was right, I realize after a discussion some days ago. Normality is dead. The world swings on extremity. A hot-tempered person is hysterical to the point where Satan himself would beg for mercy. And if they tend to tear-up, hoo boy... it's easier to barricade yourself from gushing water.

No, seriously. Where did the 'normal' people go? It's subjective I'm sure. But normal for me is a person who wouldn't intentionally harm someone. Or would be a little more... stable, in the face of adversity. Don't see that happening, do we? We see people putting guns to their heads. Slitting their wrists. Taking pills. Hell, hanging themselves, if they're too considerate to leave a mess around.

But why do it? Isn't there always a choice? Is the intolerance for imperfections so unbearable? People are normal, on the face of things. They'll greet you with a smile, speak good of the weather, give some friendly advice when you ask for it.

How long do you have to know a person before you see their real... colours, for lack of a better word... ? Because it is scary when you find out what they're about, in the long run. Very scary, indeed!

Strange times, these... makes it all the more difficult to find and sustain any kind of meaningful relationship. :|

What's wrong with love?

I roll my eyes whenever a friend puts up a self-pitying Facebook status lamenting the loss of love and how it doesn't exist or how some random guy doesn't take her calls or how she's all alone in a crowd, unloved and abandoned by pretty much everyone.

It makes me angry. So, so angry. What would a person barely out of teenage know about love? A real understanding of the matter at hand (or life in general) takes years. If humans lived longer, and women did not have a biological clock to hyperventilate about, I'm certain everyone would marry late into their 40s. It's the time when everyone's more or less sensible, quirky (but more discreet about it) and have learned the all-essential quality of toleration.

I don't understand my friends's notion of romance. So you eat out a couple of times. Talk on the phone till either your balance or your battery is exhausted. But when it comes to compromise, out fly the daggers! And down stream the tears... :\

I don't know if it's technology, emotional unavailablity or if my lot is wired differently. But people seem to have no patience for any kind of adjustment. Or maturity. Or the slightest bit of sense in their heads.

I am aware that I sound condescending in my approach. More so, since I have never been in a relationship. I had my reasons, of course. They just don't need justifying. Either way, I have a fairly decent idea of what it feels like to be let down. Royally. So I'd like to believe I know what I'm talking about.

I find the friends who claim to be abandoned by the world at large most ungrateful.

Really now, you've got family. You've got friends. You don't want to tell them what's on your mind. And you expect them to get you. It seems a difficult mental process to understand.

And it's a gender universal thing. Love is too intense and powerful a feeling to be used lightly, thrown around for the next person you share your pizza with.

A huge issue I find with my peers is that they want to grow up. And really fast at that too. We want the best of things (not in an evil, materialistic way). We want to commit and surrender completely to the charm of a beautiful relationship. Except we don't know how to. The compromise is always one-sided and the grass is always greener on the other side.

We've forgotten to wait for love. Because we're too busy trying to seek every ounce of it from whoever bestows it upon us. It's okay to wait, I want to tell my friends at times. It's okay to want to be single. It's okay to be by yourself, till you find a truly mature person you can spend your time with. Why are we in such a hurry? Why do we 'love' with such passion, only to weep at its inevitable fizzle?

Why do we pick a partner over self-esteem? Humiliation over self-reliance? Misery over sorrow? Believe you me, happiness really is a matter of choice sometimes. But when, oh when will we ever learn? :)

Friday, November 25, 2011

New Guy.

Our new Introduction to Journalism teacher did what our near-matriarchal department head couldn't do. He got us to read the papers. I have never before, in any subject, seen such an active participation from the class when it came to current affairs.

I'm not quite sure what compelling power of persuasion he holds over the class. Good speaking skills, I'll hand that to him. Also the fact that he's probably the only young, strapping lad a lot of girls in a Christian convent have seen in a long, long time. I sit amused during his classes, watching their reactions, and his own. For the most part (or maybe all the time), he seems blissfully unaware that he's in a class full of some of the hottest chicks on campus (a list I find myself excluded from. Woefully.).

It's a good thing. Decent men who don't ogle? May their tribe increase. Decent men who get hot chicks interested in *gasp* papers?? May God grant you immortality.

The gentleman in question, sadly, is not devoid of his own personal grievances. And that includes a defamation suit filed against him (yes, that won him universal sympathy from the class). Still, he takes it in his stride, teaches us - a bunch of crazy girls with unbelievable patience, before rushing off to what I can only assume is a thankless field job at the paper he works on. Hopefully, we'll get to know him better as the semester progresses.

Nice guy. New guy. I think we'll get on just fine with him. Some, I suspect, much better than the others. ;D