Friday, October 4, 2013

Detox!

I regard my Facebook page with a weary eye. It's got the same posts - the clichés - recycled, re-posted and shared. Pictures of nature with italicized font on life that's supposed to make us feel better about our own.

I'm guilty of adding to the sliding news reel above the chat window. But when it's done and shared, I am tired of going through those posts again.

Why is everyone so hell-bent on figuring life out? Most of the people on my list are folks my age. Classmates, essentially. Talking about love in grand terms.

No, really. Stuff about wanting to shatter into a million pieces, melt in some imagined Lothario's arms and vaporising into air.

Eh, what?

(It would actually be pretty frickin' cool if people could do that crap)

I'm probably a blend of romantic and pragmatic (this is one of those rare moments when I admit it), with the latter trait telling me that for all the longing I've seen in young uns my age, they're either loving too intensely or getting too detached.

I find it odd that people are waiting to get hitched all their lives and when that happens, they sit together in a cow-like stupor, tapping away at their smartphones when they should be spending time with each other.

We are so busy doing so many things (and royally screwing them all up in the process) that we forgot to live in the now. The present.

I swear, two years ago my friends and I went off to Goa to attend a film festival. The four of us were (and are!) a close-knit bunch. But two in the group stuck to texting their boyfriends on the phone and took a huge chunk of the group-time by chatting endlessly with them.

What about us and our getaway? That was forgotten. I rue over the fun conversations we never had.

My friend and I were streched in our bed, watching the offending duo as they cozied up with their better halves (?!) on their hotline.

"This is so f**king stupid," said my friend.

I smiled. Considering that she herself had been out of an emotionally draining relationship, this was saying a lot.

I'd recently posted a status update on Facebook after watching a smartphone ad, where I noted that the characters in it were so engrossed with the world in their hands that they actually looked unsociable with the rest of the lot onscreen. Not to mention that fantastic sunset they missed out on, in the backdrop. The status was liked by all my friends who were probably browsing from their smartphones. And I had uploaded it from my phone, missing a few lines of a TV show in the process.

As you can see, I am not immune.

But admission is the first step to improvement. I keep my phone away during family time... or any time when I have physical company. Whether I like them or not, courtesy (and they) demands an acknowledgement and an attempt at conversation for the given time period. We need better conversation skills. Playing the PS3 together seems the only bonding point for a lot of people.

I'm actually ranting about all this from my phone. But again, in my defence, I'm all alone in my room, left to my devices. If anyone should walk in for a chat, I will be there to give a listening ear.

My whole point of the post is that you need to detox from the lure of technology. Gossip, research and porn can wait now and then.

You won't learn from life through a few nature posts. You need to go out and seize the day. If you're still reading this ramble, I thank you with all gratitude.

Now all you need to do is walk away slowly, wear a pair of sneakers and go for a walk.

Don't stop, don't talk, don't think.

Just walk.

Maybe ditch those earphones while you're at it.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Don't Look Back

Would you fade away,
Or go astray
Into the fray,
Never to stay?

Would I need to wait,
For that gentle gait
When it gets late
And the world's gone to hate.

I need to know,
So I can go slow.
Wander in snow,
My head bowed low

To know you've left
Such is fate's deft.
Leaving me bereft
My heart down a crest.

Maybe you'll never return.
I'll take time to learn.
Wisdom from mistakes I'll earn.
Memories and pictures will burn.

Go now and don't look back.
It dents my heart, leaves a crack.
I trudge through snow to my shack,
Watching fireside embers over an evening snack.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Pax.

Pax is Latin for 'peace'. And I think the world could do with it. Anyone depicting peace as a dove is spot on. Which free bird stays on your hand too long, anyway? They're a pretty elusive species (much to the dismay of hungry meat-eaters). The idea of peace isn't that easy to grasp either.

There's always someone out there to screw your happiness. And if there isn't , life will send someone over anyway. Sanity's getting harder to find. I don't understand how everybody around is becoming as fragile as a pack of cards. Knock one set down and all others around sink, in a dramatic collapse (here's when I remember the Domino scene from V for Vendetta, but never mind).

And somehow, I see people more than eager to pick a fight. They're just the sort of people you'd want to see locked up in a Bigg Boss house (to set the place on fire). That, or make fight clubs for them. Lord knows, they need it. This is a world where dictatorships, violence, technology and culture coincide. And people can't seem to handle it. Everyone's just getting more and more isolated. More stupid. More self-centred. More insufferable. More intolerant. In fact... so  much more intolerant.

If we have to disconnect, why can't we detach from the negativity all around us, instead of those close to us? Why do we embrace negativity and shun those who love us? Why do we become like something or someone we didn't want to, to begin within? My uncle, a reasonably wise person, once said that we are a sum total of the five people closest to us. By 'closest', we mean proximity or maximum level of interaction. You don't need to have an emotional attachment to them. You just need to be around them.

And after some time... you begin to realise you are becoming like them. That's gotta hurt. But it doesn't have to. Stay collected. Stay grateful.

If you've got internet and you're reading this, you're probably also one of the privileged few who don't have to worry about sirens and curfews. You don't have to pray for an air-bomb to crash land into your living room. You're probably not off to war, in a land far away from family.

I'm just saying that there could be worse things that can happen. And worse does happen. Our lot is relatively better.

Even if everyday is a struggle, you do what you have to. Pick yourself up and try again. Shut off those annoying sounds, block out those annoying people, turn down the blinds every now and then. Just breathe. And remember that you are NEVER alone. Take it from someone who knows.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Resurrection of a sleepy specimen's blog

So far so good. Out of college? Check. Time invested in productive and paying activities? Check. Getting enough sleep? Meh. Yeeeah. Sort of.

Getting to write?

*thinks hard*

Well, yes and no.

My job entails that I do. It's wonderful work and my immediate colleagues are the best. I still haven't had the privilege of making my acquaintance with the rest of the office, but that just might be a good thing. Your tendency to like people is inversely proportional to the info you have on them.

Meanwhile. On my writing front.

This blog was the first to curse me. I think my last post was when I was in *checks* SYBMM. Oh. Wow. Okay, that is a long time. A year and four months ago. Jesus. What happened? A lot, apparently. I grew up. I made friends. I held on to the ones I already had. Became more passionate about the things I believed in. Calmer in my beliefs of the same.

Do I feel weird that college has ended? No. Upset? No. I can never be, for something that was the best thing to have happened to me. And any ex-alumni will know that you can never bid my college adieu. A real and true farewell just doesn't happen. I'm glad. I like some of my apron strings attached.

The road ahead is long, curvy and quite a blind-spot. Anybody my age reading this post would feel the same way. It's the state of most graduates, unless you've had the privilege to sort or be sorted. In which case I would LOVE to be your friend and disciple.

No, my pondering wanders into the dicey territory of creative writing. I am confronted by a white quietude wherever I look. It could be the neatly lined page of a diary. The bright starkness of this blog page (STOP STARING, OKAY!?!). And my inner concern that I may not be able to do them justice.

What if we keep sitting here, this page and I, staring, till my eyes bleed out? It just looms over my head. Preposterous, really, until you stop to think. What if your ability, if untapped for long, fades away? Just goes, whoosh, to someone who would be more indulgent with it? Like a dejected suitor finding solace in the arms of a MUCH HOTTER broad. (Okay, that metaphor went a bit too far).

I'm rambling, I know. This is exactly why I don't drink. I probably wouldn't be able to shut the hell up. But there's something about this post-graduation life that has my thoughts criss-crossing like centipedes on fire. It's evident from this post. I had no idea what I was going to say when I began typing. And now I can't stop. It's a pile of incomprehensible gibberish, anyway.

And I need to be in bed soon. Work beckons. If I'm lucky, I'll probably not oversleep after having bizarre dreams of kung fu-ing Korean men and Oldboy playing on a DVD which was supposed to feature Rome, Open City. Yes, I said 'bizarre'. If you're grammar nazi enough to substitute it with a better word, go ahead. Make my night.

While I'm off to make my day. Starting right now.

So good night. Keep dreaming. Keep working. And keep reading. Keeps the noggin a-tickin'. I'll just try to be regular with this little space right here.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

And then you get surprised!

Apologies for the recent barrage of information on my blog. These were basically a few papers I'd written for class assignments. I thought they would be of use to any other student in need. I hope they are...

But let's put aside something like assignments for a little bit of gossip I'd like to share with you. There was a teacher in our college. I won't mention her real name, but let's call her Deepa ma'am. She was a feminist, but not of the bra-burning variety. Although she did have her moments of being homicidal. And does consider herself a complete lunatic. But I state here that she is the best thing to have happened to our batch.

She was also a source of inspiration for girls who did not wish to marry. Ever.

It was just a matter of choice from her end, not some seething revulsion to the male race. Although it surprised me to think how a woman as fascinating as her managed to stay single. Were men that stupid? Or was she too good for any of them?

She remained an epitome of the modern Indian woman surviving alone in a bustling city. Deepa ma'am took the relatives's jibes, sympathies and pity in her stride and marched on. If there were moments of yearning and silent conflict in her life, she did not make them known. It seemed impossible to make a dent in her armour. But even the finest of metals, much less the human heart are bound to wither away their defences.

It was a pleasant day in... would it be early January? Let's say it was early January. Deepa ma'am was in class, teaching us Advertising. Sharanya, the former Student Body President of our college walked into our class. She looked smug. Like a cat who had stolen more than her share of cream and gotten away with it.

"What did you do over the weekend?" she asked the entire class. We did not answer. If Sharanya was getting somewhere, this was a weird way to start. But what she shrieked next made us forget the beginning - "DEEPA GOT MARRIED!"

The whole class screamed, first at the sound and then again at the news when we realised the enormity of what happened. Deepa ma'am at age 35 was finally married! And to a man who had come as a guest lecture for one of the Saturday sessions. I was absent for that one (dang!).

There were murmurs of happiness, approval and even some of disappointment because the 'feminist idol' was now hitched. A few of the girls felt betrayed. But I suppose that's what happens when you're 'off the market'. Hearts are bound to break.

The teachers were mighty pleased too. Mrs. Stevens, who introduced us to the world of cinema congratulated Deepa ma'am. I remember ma'am saying that she was happy with the man because being older meant they were more independent and hence did not have to take care of each other. Mrs. Stevens then said that she spent her initial days of marriage playing chess with her husband. Somehow, I suspect 'chess' to be a euphemism for something more... enjoyable...

I'm not much of a believer in fairy-tale endings. Maybe I'm, in the heart of hearts, maybe not. I guess we can never really know ourselves, much less other people. I mean, seriously. Who could've thought Deepa ma'am getting married? She'd written it off! But somehow, in some mysterious functionings of the Almighty, she found someone when she hadn't really been looking.

What did it take to melt her... I wonder... ? Was it a look? A word? Some intelligent courting? Or a moment too private and intimate to describe? But it happened. The realisation dawned. Maybe it hit her with the suddenness of a pillow. Maybe it sank in, like a gradual enlightenment. However, it came, I'm sure it surprised her. It definitely surprised us.

PS: When asked what made Deepa ma'am realise she loved him, ma'am said, "I have known a lot of people who have annoyed me over the years. But he annoyed me the most. I knew there was something special about a man who did, to such an extent. And that's when I knew he had to matter more than the rest."

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Nielsam TAM ratings.

Television has rapidly become an important medium of communication, information and entertainment. This has led to an expansion in its reach and the channels being televised. Therefore, in a world of cutthroat competition and innovative programming, making an informed decision about the audience’s viewing habits does help in staying a few steps ahead of the competition.
This requirement brought about the need for specialised market research. TAM (Television Audience Measurement) is thus used for gauging how well a particular programme is being received.
What are they?
TAM Media Research is a joint collaboration between Nielsen Company and Kantar Media Research. Presently, it is headed by Mr.  L. V. Krishnan, C.E.O. and Mr. Pradeep Hejmadi, Senior Vice President.
“Appointed by the Industry stakeholders of ISA (Indian Society of Advertisers), IBF (Indian Broadcast Foundation) and AAAI (Advertising Agencies Association of India) in 1998, the raison d’être for TAM (Television Audience Measurement) is to be the central Industry provider of Media and Consumer Insights to the various stakeholders of the Indian Media and Entertainment Industry - Advertisers & Marketers, Media Owners, Media Agencies and the Academia.”
As of now, TAM is the only electronic rating agency in India. It is the central figure of authority where TV viewership is concerned. TAM casts a wide net, covering all towns and cities with a population of more than a lakh, and semi rural towns with a population of less than a lakh. Its sample panel consists of 36,000 individuals from across 165 cities and towns, covering about 8, 150 homes which have a television set!
How are they measured?
In 2006, TAM had initiated a study on the future of Digital Television, something which was a first of its kind. After that, since 2007, TAM is responsible for measuring and reporting on the TV viewership data “for Terrestrial TV Homes, Cable & Satellite TV Homes and the Digital TV Homes.” (Information courtesy: http://www.tamindia.com/tamindia/Company_Profile.htm)
For the purpose of measuring the audience viewership, TAM Media Research makes use of the TVM5 peoplemeter.
The Nielsen peoplemeters are a state-of-the-art technology, known for their accuracy and detail which has surpassed all the previous forms of alternative measurements that have been used.
The audience viewership is measured in the following steps:
·         The Establishment Survey: This survey is conducted to determine the characteristics of the audience watching a particular programme, keeping the social and demographic features in mind. Thus, it provides Nielsen a database of the target households where the peoplemeter is to be installed.
·         The Panel: This is the statistical sample of the target audience to be measured. A Nielsen technician installs the peoplemeter in these houses, which is determined by the establishment survey.
·         The Peoplemeter: Peoplemeters are installed in every house in the panel. Each meter is capable of measuring the television viewing activity of every member of the house, for every different television set in the house. This meter, then transmits all the stored data to a production centre, through the household television/cellular line.
·         The Polling: The entire process, where the date is transferred from the peoplemeters to the production centre, by means of a television/cellular line is called polling.

What are they used for?

The TAM system, as mentioned above is used for quantifying and qualifying the audience information and channelising it towards market research. While measuring the viewership in the broadcast medium, one rating point is taken as one percent viewing out of the population group being monitored.
The responsibility of the TAM system is to provide an accurate reading of all the houses included in the panel and determine effectively the ratings and viewership of each of the channels. It is imperative for a TAM system to be not just reliable, but also to be a source of unbiased data and to be transparent i.e. open for any kind of  inspection or auditing.
It is important to note, however, that TAM is used for measuring not only the television viewership garnered by a programme, but also for a variety of reason such as advertising expenditure of various advertisers, brand and product categories as well as print and radio, through its division, known as AdEx India.

Why are they important?

The ratings, measured by the peoplemeter and considered to be accurate, help the broadcasters gauge the popularity of a particular programme and charge the advertisers accordingly. The TAM Media Research comprises of the S-group, which is a specialist strategy group which has pioneered in the field of broadcast management. The S-group has been set-up to derive a better understanding of consumption trends and, through systematic research aims to increase the viewership by effectively catering to the target audience’s needs.

The Top 5 TV channels

The top 5 television channels today, are:

·         Star Plus
·         Colors
·         Zee TV
·         Sony
·         Imagine TV

Top 5 programmes in India

·         Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? (Star Plus)
·         Geet Hui Sabsi Parayi (Star One)
·         Bigg Boss 5 (Colors)
·         Ek Hazaaron Mein Meri Behna Hain (Star Plus)
·         Hitler Didi (Zee TV)

What are the limitations of TAM?

TAM is criticised for the following reasons:
·         Lack of accuracy: Although TAM measures the viewership of a particular programme, it does not cover the duration of the viewership. Therefore, if a viewer watches a particular television show for not more than a minute, the rating point is awarded for the entire duration of that show, not just for the one minute.
·         Sample size: TAM has been criticised for the sample size of the panel. The panel is not considered to be all-encompassing, when it comes to the entire population of the country. It is for this reason that the more discerning audience feels that they have not been taken into consideration, while formulating concepts for new shows.
·         Lack of timeliness: TAM takes a week to report the television rating points of shows. Its competitor aMap makes the data available on a daily basis for its clients, unlike the weekly ratings given by TAM. In a dynamic media environment, it thus becomes imperative for TAM to deliver on time, and toe the line with its competitors.
CONCLUSION
Through this project, one can come to realize that although TAM is a pioneer in the technology of calculating ratings, having won accolades at various International Research and Communications seminars, most notably the ESOMAR – Asia Pacific Conference in Shanghai & WAM Conference in Geneva in 2004. The project acquaints the reader with the functioning of the TAM, and the process involved in calculating the ratings of each programme. However, no system is infallible. TAM also has its own set of limitations that it needs to overcome. That said, media and market research is here to stay. And as long as there is an expansion of media enterprises in the country, there will always be a requirement for technology like TAM to assess the various market segments.



BIBLIOGRAPHY

·         Nielsen TAM product : Peoplemeter - http://www.agbnielsen.net/products/peoplemeter.asp


·         Top 5 programme ratings - http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2350015

·         Top TV channels of India - http://celewood.com/2011/07/top-3-tv-channels-of-india/





Understanding Cinema: Comparative Narrative Analysis of Citizen Kane and Rashomon.

If cinema were an infinite road, stretching on to eternity, Rashomon and Citizen Kane would be significant milestones one would discover along the way. Both had redefined the narrative style of story-telling with path-breaking technique, riveting storylines and memorable performances.
Released in a gap of nine years, both films were recipients of Academy Awards (Citizen Kane for Best Writing, Original Screenplay; Rashomon for Best Film in Foreign Category).
Citizen Kane (1941) follows the dramatic rise and fall of media moghul, Charles Foster Kane, from a humble beginning in Colorado, to one of idealistic (initially) service at The Inquirer newspaper, to an unsuccessful foray into politics. Kane dies alone in the end, uncared for and isolated from the world. His self-created Utopia – Xanadu remains an emblem of his life – towering, ostentatious and incomplete.
Rashomon (1950) traces the aftermath of a rape and murder from the perspective of the perpetrator and the victims.  A young wife is raped by the bandit Tajômaru in the presence of her samurai husband, who is tied to a tree. The husband is later murdered. The gravity of the crime(s) may not change, but the versions of all involved certainly do.
Having briefly understood the storyline of both the films, we shall now endeavour to examine the most salient features that propelled these celluloid tales to cult status.





THE ANALYSIS

§  The framing and core narrative: In simple terms, the framing narrative comprises of those sequences which take place outside the main story, whereas the core narrative consists of scenes which are the main plot in itself.

Ø Citizen Kane: Citizen Kane’s framing narrative features the long drawn search by a generally anonymous journalist named Thompson. He interviews the key characters who were closely associated with Kane. It is their reminisces that take the audience to the core narrative featuring Charles Foster Kane.

The overall narrative of Citizen Kane is the journey of a reporter as he tries to unravel the mystery behind Kane’s last word – “Rosebud.” It depicts the different relationship Kane had with each character, while also dealing with their perception of him.

Ø Rashomon: The track of the Woodcutter, Listener and Priest discussing the horrific incident forms the framing narrative of the story. The courtyard scenes where the characters give their testimony and the varying nature of the incident itself (a flashback within a flashback) forms the core narrative of the plot.

Rashomon has an aura of mystery like Citizen Kane, but its core narrative deals with finding the truth behind a crime, than a particular person.

§  Editing:

Ø Citizen Kane: It makes extensive use of dissolves, long-shots, fading, and super-imposition for appropriate dramatic effect. Some examples of memorable editing from the film are as follows:

o   The opening sequence: The silhouetted quietude of the opening montage, right from the upward pan to the “No Trespassing” sign to the dissolves leading to the foreboding interiors of his room contrasts with the abrupt beginning and end of the New on the March newsreel. The viewer is then abruptly jerked into a projection room, dimly lit by the outlines of men. This opening sets the mood of the film, invariably preparing the audience for the somber atmosphere that was to follow.

o   The flashbacks: Every recollection of the character leads to a dissolve into their memory of that time. Especially the scene where the page of Thatcher’s memoir dissolves from an unclear haze to a snowy wilderness, which perfectly captures the barren isolation of his childhood.

o   The breakfast scene: Leland’s description of Kane’s marriage leads to a reference cut (in a dissolve) to Kane and Emily at the breakfast table. The scene shows their marital discord through a series of innovative cuts. It begins with the newly married couple in wedded bliss. The camera spins in a fast flick pan which results in a change of costume, background score, implying a passage of time. The music now gets more discordant as the scene progresses, ending only with Emily reading The Chronicle at the farthest end of the table.

o   The super-imposition of headlines and stage performances: One of the most memorable visuals in the film is the super-imposition of laudatory newspaper headlines (The Inquirer’s), Susan’s performances and the flickering light bulb.

o   The climax: The climax denotes the end of the story after it comes in a full circle. The camera pans out of the mansion, and down the fence to the formidable “No Trespassing” sign. It dissolves to the smoke coming out of the chimney, a profound metaphor to what eventually became of his life.

Ø Rashomon:

o   Opening sequence: The film opens with The Woodcutter and Priest taking shelter from the rain at the Rashomon Gate. Before the entry of The Listener, there is a deathly silence in the scene. There is very little camera movement in the scene, with the emphasis mostly on the downpour and the grim expressions of both the protagonists.

o   The Woodcutter’s walk: What could have otherwise been a long drawn sequence is edited to sustain the interest of the audience. Various tracking shots of the sun gleaming through the trees, of The Woodcutter (with frequent close-ups of the back of his head; his axe) are interspersed with long shots of him walking through the forest. This clearly establishes the setting. The brevity of each shot illustrates a sense of pace and ominousness.

o   The fight sequence: There is a great sense of pace conveyed through the fight sequence because of the brief cutting in the bandit’s version. Because the men are reluctant to fight in The Woodcutter’s version, the cutting is invariably slower, and the camera movements more static.

o   Change of sequence: Kurosawa makes use of wipes to switch between a character’s narration of the incident in the courtyard to the actual event itself. The wipe was also used to switch between two testimonies like between The Woodcutter and The Priest.

o   The ending sequence: Kurosawa uses the dissolve towards the end, when The Listener leaves the shelter of the Rashomon Gate. The camera dissolves from a long shot to a mid-shot to a close shot of the shocked Priest and Woodcutter. The dissolve beautifully emphasizes the silence of the moment and the collective horror.

§  Composition:

Ø Citizen Kane:

o   Deep focus: Citizen Kane is known to be one of the earliest films to use “deep focus” framing. In such framing, the characters in the foreground and background are both clear and in focus, unlike conventional shots where either one of the characters in blurred or out of focus.

o   Lighting: The opening sequence is the best example of lighting in Citizen Kane. From the darkness of Kane’s bedside to the stark News on the March newsreel to the dim projection room, to Thatcher’s library, to the opera house (and so on), each change in the same location provides a dramatic change of visual.

o   Camera placement: Citizen Kane makes use of innovative camera angles to emphasise a particular relationship between the characters. This is most prominent in the upward camera perspective from Kane’s POV when he looks up at Mr. Thatcher as a child, and in Susan’s POV when she looks at Kane.

It is also placed in such a way that the character in the foreground has a dominating presence over the character in the background. Both camera angles denote a sense of inferiority from the perspective of the character looking up. The camera is also kept at a slant in certain scenes, hence breaking away from the conventional shot taking.

Ø Rashomon:

o   Lighting: The film uses natural light which filters through the foliage. It adds that extra dimension in the drama because of the play in light and shadows, leading to a more haunting effect in the grove. The lighting is stark in the courtyard, as if a metaphor for the austere atmosphere of the court. The cloudy gloom of the Rashomon Gate is also captured beautifully in the opening titles.

o   Camera placement: Kurosawa uses a lot of over-the-shoulder shots, more notably in the grove sequences. There are also shots taken of each character with a deliberate repetition to emphasise the triangular relationship between them. There are also uses of track and pan shots in this sequence (especially when the bandit menacingly circles the samurai).

In the courtyard scene, the camera is placed at an eye level before the parties involved to represent the perspective of the judge, and also of the audience.

§  Dialogue and sound:

Ø Citizen Kane: The dialogue remains with the viewer long after the film is over. There are many lines inside the film which are ironic (“You know, Mr. Bernstein, if I hadn't been very rich, I might have been a really great man”), tragic (“Old age. It's the only disease, Mr. Thompson, that you don't look forward to being cured of.”) and quotable (“To love on my terms. Those are the only terms anybody knows ...  his own.”).

It is the most integral part of Citizen Kane, aiding greatly in the pace and establishing of the characters. This is most notably conveyed through the News on the March opening, Kane’s takeover of the staff of The Chronicle among other key flashback sequences.

The background score for the film was composed by Bernard Herrmann, earning itself an Oscar nomination for Best Music. Along with dialogue, the background score effectively dramatised the proceedings in the film, adapting to suit the changing tone of the story.

Ø Rashomon: Akira Kurosawa’s fascination for the era of silent films is evident by the absence of dialogue in Rashomon. The emphasis is more on close-ups, the ambience of express the gravity of the situation.

However, the use of “Bolero” (Maurice Ravel) in the soundtrack of Fumio Hayasaka cannot be ignored.

§  Symbolism:

Ø Citizen Kane:

o   Xanadu: The forlorn, isolated manor is a symbol of the man himself. It represents the hollowness, the lack of meaning behind frivolous décor and the myth of the American dream. The expansiveness of the manor effectively implies the physical distance between Kane and Susan.

o   “Rosebud” and the snow globe: The sled “Rosebud” and the snow globe stand for the innocence of a childhood lost. When the globe shatters on Kane’s demise and the sled is destroyed in the fire, it signifies an end to that which linked him to his childhood.

o   Statues: The statues in Kane’s office (and later Xanadu) show his need to control the people around him. The more his isolation increases, the greater number of statues he collects. Kane possesses a strange desire to impulsively purchase statues (most unopened), as they, unlike human beings fill the echoing spaces in Xanadu, without clamouring for his attention.

Ø Rashomon:

o   The Rashomon Gate: The Rashomon Gate stands as a symbol of culture and civilization which has been ravaged by the mists of time and the portentous rain. When The Listener desecrates the remains of the gate to create a fire, it shows that even a symbol of culture can be defiled during times of strife.

o   The rain: The rain is a symbol of darkness and gloom. It is aptly depicts the disturbed era the main protagonists are living through.

o   The medium: The medium who conveys the testimony of the dead samurai to the court, adds a metaphysical dimension to the story.

o   The courtyard: Its stark and white surroundings stand for truth as the court wants it – in a kind of cold bluntness.

§  Theme:

Ø Citizen Kane: It deals with the theme of avariciousness, wealth, the relentless pursuit of power and love. Above all, it denounces the myth of the great American dream – the futile search for material happiness. For affluence cannot buy you love.

Ø Rashomon: Rashomon deals not just with the relativity of truth but also the self-image a person creates of oneself. Every character narrates a version which holds him/her in higher stead than the rest of the characters. It raises a disturbing question about the ultimate reality – does it really exist?

CONCLUSION

 This project covers the most salient narrative techniques of both films. However, the remarkable contribution of Rashomon and Citizen Kane to the world of cinema renders the analysis in this project to be woefully inadequate. Nevertheless, the project has initiated a broader perspective on both films, and a greater receptivity regarding the various interpretations offered to those who seek it. Despite being unique for their time, admired and vilified in equal measure (Citizen Kane more specifically), the films lived on to create history and remain a reference point for filmmakers and students of media alike, where aesthetic story-telling is concerned.








BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.     Forward @ 50: My two page Rashomon paper -http://forwardatfifty.blogspot.com/2011/01/my-two-page-rashomon-paper.html

2.     Spark Notes: Citizen Kane - http://www.sparknotes.com/film/citizenkane/themes.html


3.     A Short History of the Movies: Gerald Mast


5.     Movie Rapture: http://www.movierapture.com/rashomon.htm