Showing posts with label niharika puri. Show all posts
Showing posts with label niharika puri. Show all posts

Sunday, January 14, 2018

The Sober Mind Wanders (A Lot).

What ill-fortune must befall a teetotaller to be trapped in an evening of loud music, poor lighting, no company and repeated exhortation of alcohol consumption? The weary shall elaborate.

It was a farewell party of a colleague - not one I had much interaction with during my ongoing time at a film production house. The other colleagues who expressed their love and admiration for him, have on many occasions prior, theorised his actual role in the company, given his alleged lack of preoccupation in his alloted job profile (we agreed on money laundering. Yes, this is all in jest).

The venue of an emotional tipsy farewell was voted a popular eating joint frequented by film industry denizens and strugglers of a Mumbai suburb that inhabits said patrons. This place was chosen because of the fizzy needs of the colleagues and the meat-eating requirements of yours truly (an alternative was a vegetarian restaurant, vetoed mostly by the sign of our collective, horrified baulking.)

And so, here we were at The Site of the Farewell, where the loud music was not conducive for conversation and the space crunch was a tragic mirror of every Mumbaikar's life ever. We sit in contemplative silence over the order of the day - the menu - and place them. The waiter jots down the drinks with an obliging smile that fast turns mocking, when, in a flurry of Bloody Marys and martinis, comes my request for a strawbery and guava Juice. "Mocktail?" he asks. "Yes, mocktail." He gives me a glance of amused condecension. Are waiters allowed to do that? No tip for him.

The music blared on. A prominent film/TV actor sat on a table next to us with much younger boys as they proceeded to have loud, booze-fueled, expletive-ridden exchanges. In another corner, a not-quite yesteryear actress with graceful ageing by her side engaged politely with a bunch of youngsters. I had lapsed into an existential, internal monologue which is not as articulate in hindsight, but seemed profound at the time. It was difficult not to be so. Everybody around me was bonding over their drinks. When a time for shots came, one of them insisted that I partake. Another one asked me why I don't drink. Two years in this company and every office party is a fragmented voice over auto-tuned songs asking me when I will give up my self-imposed abstinence and eventually understand what I am missing out on all these years.

However well-meaning the insistence, it is frustrating to shake my head. My steadily-growing firm defiance is possibly misconstrued as a moral high-ground. An assumption that I do not partake but ferociously judge those who do (never mind that the subtle exclusion has always been the other way around). Fun fact - I hail from a Punjabi family. Fun fact deux - I hail from a Punjabi family with a military background. Both communities have alcohol as a part of their social accessory. If I choose not to drink, despite emerging from this liberating confluence of cultures, it is most certainly out of choice and not out of any sense of morality. It is slightly disheartening when my older colleagues must talk about my preference at every event instead of understanding where my choice comes from. Perhaps, that is their choice.

It may seem like a superfluous rant and I truly would not consider it necessary if I was a freelancer and had to reacquaint every disbelieving drinker with this "behenji's" needs. No, gracious host, I do not wish to drink and I do not care much if others around me do. Live and let live, yes. No means no, yes (although this seems to work more for the topic of feminism than drinking).

When I asked Judgemental Waiter for a refill, he took the 'mock' in mocktail seriously when he asked me if I wanted a margarita instead. "Do you have a problem with mocktails?" I asked him with my sweetest smile. "No." "Then get me a mocktail." The mocktail was gotten, the stupidity unforgotten.

All conversations at the table revolved around drinks (blank) and food (this, I could get behind!). But somewhere, with two years of this rodeo, this non-acceptance from a well-intentioned lot exhausted me. My thoughts wandered to how we were characters in a play. The settings may change but the dialogue and the well-worn gestures did not. It was as if we were all being wound in a timeless rewind of conduct, everyday and at every event. Why are we here? I wondered. Why do we do this?

"Are you alright?" asked a senior writer at the celebration, with an Old Monk in his hand and boredom in his eyes.

I made a half-hearted excuse about being tired and having an early start tomorrow.

He asked again, too seasoned for the lies of a 20-something ponderer.

"I'm bored," I mouthed.

His next words were encouraging - "Then leave. Social etiquette is over-rated. If an event does not work for you, you should be allowed to exit it."

A colleague decided to call it a night and I followed suit soon after. I wished the former colleague well. He shook my hand before the rest of the attendees converged for blurry selfies. For a second, I almost envied them. Conformance could be peaceful. A preference for fruity goodness is usually an uphill struggle. I have had many express their exasperation, including friends who have a taste for the good stuff but a wariness when it came to drinking with their collegues. Apparently there, the judgement was more fierce because the co-workers took it as an affront that a known drinker chose not to do so in their preference.

Such trivial issues, such major reactions. The only time we should ever be looking into another plate (or glasses) is to see if they have enough as a controversial comedian once said. While the party spirit continued unabated, I took a rickshaw home, the sea-breeze my comforting companion (and hair disheveler) on the way back. I changed, I slipped under the covers and opened Madhushala on my Kindle. To read about celebratory chaos away from an actual one is liberating. Bless you, literature and Mr. Bachchan! It is your words that provide my greatest intoxication yet.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Nice things.

Ever thought that your middle class roots have ruined you?

Me neither.

Still middle class for the record.

If you're a TV-owning individual with decent browsing habits, you would have seen Sarabhai v/s Sarabhai (a landmark of good programming but it is a lament which requires a blog post afresh). You would have been acquainted with Maya, the Sarabhai matriarch sass and speaker of anti-middle class tirades. You would have cringed but admittedly found it funny when she let loose a slew of middle-class conduct that she found horrific. Where'd the creators come up with that list, anyway? It seems like they spent their whole lives compiling it.

Thrift is definitely the first lesson that was taught/engrained/bored into my mind/being/soul. My parents were freelancers  (and likely will be) their whole lives. It's either feast or famine in such a choice so you obviously do the smart thing by spending on essentials, without going into Mohnisha Sarabhai mode (Maya's miserly daughter-in-law, bane of contention, beacon of extreme middle classiyat).

So everytime I chance upon an exorbitant price tag on food/wearable items/stuff I can't even describe, my immediate reaction is to convulse and roll on the ground until there is a tunnel deep enough for me to crawl in to take me home. At least that way, I beat the city's rush hour. #SilverLinings

Seriously, though. You show me a thing of expense, it better be a thing of beauty too. Or sheer delectableness (am I doing this right?). No sir, I will not partake of your coffee which costs me a lung or a puny European serving which will fetch two kidneys and a heart valve unless Zeus himself is serving me, impeccable apron in place (seeing as Zeus is essentially in the raw, wearing an apron won't hurt).

It doesn't hurt to want and get nice things. That's why it's okay to have a regular paying job (which also has its own pitfalls but that is also another lament for an entire series of books). "So what are you going to buy?" my folks ask. "Rubber bands. I'm running out." They exchange a look of 'hai, gareeb aatma' but I have a lot of hair. On my scalp, while we're being specific.

I don't enjoy spending all that much. Outside food does my exterior (or posterior...) no favours, clothes will not fit if said proportion(s) are not maintained. Two pleasures that are at odds with each other. Wow, such sad.

"Own experiences, not things, baby," said a sagely elder to me before browsing for GIFs on her smartphone again. Great plan. I look at foreign destinations. Everything looks so much cheaper when you're looking at the numerals in $ and € without converting it to our own freaking devalued currency. (WHY GOD WHY, this entitled millenial shrieks).

I type this entire post on a laptop gifted to me six years ago, with WiFi in my room seated on a bed as old as me, but oh, so comfortable. Meanwhile, in third world continents, the seven countries banned by Trump, in USA, the world, the whole freaking galaxy, chaos reigns supreme as it must while we sit in our individual worlds, pondering over our next move and how much life sucks.

Still want them nice things, tho.

And now that my 1AM brain has done smearing this white space with text, I can finally prepare for bed. There's work to be done tomorrow, mild soul-searching, a walk under the sky and yet another film to be watched. Know where to look and some of these nice things come for free.

Monday, October 21, 2013

MAMI 2013: Day 3

Monday, 21st October was my third day at MAMI. Gave the Sunday screenings a miss because I was so tired. I had intended to watch 60 going on 12 and Giraffada. There is no repeat screening for either of them. But do double check.

I intended to see five films today. Could only make it to 4. Or rather, 4 1/4.


  • Short Term 12:
I had a choice between this and a Mexican film called Heli. While the latter was about the downward spiral of protagonists into the hellish world of drugs and violence, the former was set in a foster care facility. And I'm always a sucker for uplifting cinema. Plus, I'd read a largely favourable response for this one.

I wasn't expecting much to begin with, but did not find satisfaction in the final outcome. 

Destin Cretton's Short Term 12 follows Grace (Brie Larson from 21 Jump Street), a worker at the foster care, who is very good at what she does. There's a dark past that still hangs around her neck like an albatross, but her co-worker and boyfriend Mason (John Gallagher Jr. aka Jim Harper from The Newsroom) is supportive all the way.

She begins to share her past with the newest entrant (inmate?), a troubled teenager named Jayden. Their uneasy bond is their road to salvation. The drama has its moments, which is why I can't dismiss this right away. But it's not making it on my recommendation list because of its languid pace and some non-inspiring conversations between characters. (How convenient is it that Grace and wild-child Jayden connect on the exact same trauma and ticks?)

Maybe I was expecting a more mainstream mood-elevator and didn't realise it. Still, after today there will be no repeat screenings of this film.

  • Bekas:
Karzan Kader's Bekas was not my first choice for an afternoon watch. What I really wanted to see was Blue Is The Warmest Color, which was running to packed houses. Instead, I had to settle for a story of two Iraqi boys wanting to escape the Saddam Hussain regime by going to America and meeting Superman. Sounds ironic? Sad? Replete with irony?

Bekas is all this and also manages to be predominantly uplifting. Brothers Zana (Zamand Taha) and Dana (Sarwar Fazil) want to wing it to America (which they believe is a city shaped as Europe while they reside in 'Africa'!) so that Superman can fly back with them and avenge the death of their parents, possibly killed by Saddam's soldiers.

So while it is on the face of it the journey of two boys across the unforgiving topography, it is also a bigger comment on the ensuing military rule happening in the background. That's easy to spot.

Kader has the remarkable ability to take you to the brink of despair and pull you right back towards a deeply satisfying conclusion.

This film is recommended viewing, though will sadly not be screened again at the fest.

  • Keeper of Lost Causes:
Mikkel Norgaard's film is apparently based on a book, something I gathered with a little reading online. I'd never seen a Danish film (not to my recollection anyway) and did not know what to expect from the thriller. But rest assured, I think it's probably the best film I've seen all day (alongside Bekas, of course).

Chief detective Carl Morck (Nikolaj Lie Kaas) is assigned to Department Q of the police department after a mission gone fatally wrong. The caustic cop is now relegated to a desk with an assistant named Assad (Fares Fares), where he is supposed to go over closed cases and sort them accordingly. The disappearance of politician Merete Lynggaard (Sonja Rochter) grabs his attention.

A beautiful woman. Disappeared from a passenger boat. Her brain-damaged brother Uffe (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard) was hysterical at the scene of the disappearance. What's happening?

Many may not find the noir thriller earth-shattering. Nor do I, truth be told. I could see how the climax would shape up. But it is still something I would heavily recommend. Do NOT miss. It's one of the most engrossing films I've seen in the festival so far.

  • For Those In Peril:
Oh Lord, I can't believe I missed Sulemani Keeda for this. SK was running to a packed house, so I decided to settle for this disaster movie. And I mean that literally. There is nothing I found worth writing home about. No clue what trip director Paul Wright was on while filming this. There were numerous walk-outs during this screening and I happened to be one of them. Damn! Really did want to see five films. This was the 1/4 I did see. And immensely regret.

It will be repeated on 22nd October, Tuesday at Metro, Screen 5 at 3:30 pm. Watch at your own risk.

  • A Castle In Italy:
Aaaaaaaaaaah! As if my mood wasn't crabby enough with the above film. I had a choice between the much acclaimed Gloria and this one. And I chose ACIT, because there's a castle. In Italy. With romance. What could go wrong, right? RIGHT? Wrong. So wrong. *shoots self*

There's a former actress with a younger actor pursuing her. Actress' castle has to be given out for rent because her family is debt-ridden.You'd think this was the plot but then there are such annoying, unnecessary plot tangents, you stop caring.

Writer-director Valeria Bruni-Tedeschi is the leading lady of the film. The limelight's on her, so other characters and the semblance of a plot take a major beating.

The film will be repeated at Cinemax, Screen 1 on 23rd October at 6 pm. But just confirm that, if poss.

Until next time, folks. Take care.